From Skepticism To Support
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
BonJour’s Abductivist Reply to Skepticism
According to the abductivist reply to skepticism, the continuity, coherence and repeatable regularities found in our sensory experiences cry out for explanation. Abductivists claim the best explanation of these features of our experience is that they reflect objective regularities in the world. They maintain that the hypothesis that our sense experiences are caused by objects having roughly the...
متن کاملResponse to “Skepticism about desert”
Swartzer concludes the paper with the claim that desert is not a basic normative notion. It cannot “supply first principles of justice.” (p. 1) In other words, desert is to be defined in terms of justice, not the other way around. What we deserve just is what we are to receive according to the demands of justice. On this view, to say that a just distribution of goods is such that everyone recei...
متن کاملCharcot's skepticism.
This paper brings a short review about a peculiar characteristic of Professor Charcot, the father of neurology: the skepticism, emphasizing his personal view regarding the prognosis of several neurological conditions.
متن کاملSkepticism, Sensitivity, and Closure, or Why the Closure Principle is Irrelevant to External World Skepticism
Is there a plausible argument for external world skepticism? Robert Nozick’s well–known discussion focuses upon arguments which utilize the Sensitivity Requirement and the Closure Principle. Nozick claims, correctly, that no such argument succeeds. But he gets almost all the details wrong. The Sensitivity Requirement and the Closure Principle are compatible; the Sensitivity Requirement is incor...
متن کاملStructuralism as a Response to Skepticism
A classic argument for skepticism about the external world runs as follows. First: we cannot know that the evil-demon hypothesis is false, where the evil-demon hypothesis says that all of our sensory experiences have been produced by an evil demon. Second: if we cannot know that the evil-demon hypothesis is false, we cannot know we have hands. Conclusion: We cannot know we have hands. Generaliz...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Chemical & Engineering News Archive
سال: 1998
ISSN: 0009-2347,2157-4936
DOI: 10.1021/cen-v076n043.p005